REVISED
GUIDELINES TO REGULATE MATTER RELATING TO ADOPTION OF INDIAN CHILDREN (1994)
| Aims and Objects | Need for Family Support | Review of Adoption Procedure |
1.1 The objective of the present
guidelines is to provide a sound basis for adoption within the framework of the norms and
principles laid down by the Supreme Court of India in the series of judgments delivered in
L.K. Pandey vs. Union of India and Others between 1984 and 1991.
1.2
Adoption undoubtedly offers an important avenue for the care and protection of an
abandoned, destitute or neglected child in a family setting and provides an atmosphere of
happiness, love and understanding for the realisation of his/her talents and potentials. It carries with it all the emotional, physical and
material security necessary for the proper development of the child and also serves as the
most reliable means of preventing situations associated with the abuse, exploitation and
social maladjustment of abandoned, destitute and neglected children.
1.3
The Government of India, in pursuance of its constitutional mandate, has evolved a
National Policy for the Welfare of Children. The
thrust of this policy is summed up in the following words:
"The nation's children
are a supremely important asset. Their
nurture and solicitude are our responsibility. Children's
programme should find a prominent part in our national plans for the development of human
resources, so that our children grow up to become robust citizens, physically fit,
mentally alert and morally healthy, endowed with the skills and motivations needed by
society. Equal opportunities for development
to all children during the period of growth should be our aim, for this would serve our
large purpose of reducing inequality and ensuring social justice."
1.4
There has been equally great concern for the welfare of children at the
international level culminating in the Declaration of the Rights of the Child, adopted by
the General Assembly of the United Nations on 20th November, 1989. Thereafter, in various international fora
conferences and seminars, this subject of child welfare has continued to be constantly
debated.
1.5
The National Policy for the Welfare of Children also stresses the vital role which
the voluntary organisations have to play in the field of education, health, recreation and
social welfare services for children and declares that it shall be the endeavour of the
state to encourage and strengthen such voluntary organisations.
Need for Family Support for the Development of the
Children
1.6
It is an accepted fact that the balanced development of a child-emotional, physical
and intellectual, can be best ensured within the family, or where this is not possible,
then in familial surroundings. The
responsibility for providing care and protection to children including those who are
orphaned, abandoned, neglected and abused rests primarily with the family, the community
and the society at large. However, since many
traditional institutions including the family structure are undergoing vertical as well as
horizontal social changes on account of urbanisation, industrialisation and the general
process of development, family support to a child is not always available. It, therefore, becomes the responsibility of the
community, of the society and of the state to provide both institutional and
non-institutional support to destitute children. Government
of India considers adoption as the best non-institutional support for rehabilitation of
children.
Traditionally, our society has been providing support through charitable institutions and non-institutional activities like adoption, guardianship and foster care. Due to rapid changes in the social structure and other related factors, the number of children who need care, protection and rehabilitation is on the increase. It is, therefore, necessary not only to expand both institutional and non-institutional facilities for the nurture of such children, but also to regulate and monitor all programmes so as to ensure minimum standards in all child welfare activities. Among non-institutional modes, the interest of the child can best be served through adoption in a family. Further, it is also an accepted fact that the child develops best in his or her own cultural and social milieu. Thus, placement of a child through adoption in an indigenous setting would be ideal for his or her growth and development. Inter-country adoption, i.e. adoption of Indian children by adoptive parents residing abroad, should be resorted to only if all efforts to place the child with adoptive parents residing in India prove unsuccessful. Generally, in all matters concerning adoption whether within the country or abroad, the welfare and interest of the child shall be paramount. Therefore, private adoptions of abandoned, destitute and surrendered/relinquished children conducted by unauthorised individuals, agencies or institutions should be discouraged and it should not be open to any individual agency or institution whether owned or run by the Government or not to process an application from a foreigner for taking a child in adoption. It should be the endeavour of Government to facilitate in-country adoption and to regulate inter-country adoption of Indian children.
1.7
In pursuance of the Supreme Court directives, the Ministry of Welfare vide its
resolution dated 4-7-1989 formulated a set of guidelines to regulate, monitor and
supervise programmes pertaining to adoption. That
laid down the existing procedure and practices. The
existing procedure and practices followed in the case of inter~ country adoption were
thoroughly reviewed by the Supreme Court in their subsequent judgments dated 19th
September, 1989, 14th August, 1991, 29th October, 1991, 14th November, 1991 and 20th
November, 1991 respectively, in Writ Petition (CRL) No. 1171/1982 by Shri L.K. Pandey vs.
Union of India and others. The Ministry of
Welfare after a careful study of all the judgments of the Supreme Court of India and
existing laws of the land and after taking into account the experience of the concerned
governmental as well as voluntary agencies and the changing social realities, decided to
modify these guidelines. In this direction,
the Ministry of Welfare constituted a Task Force consisting of members representing
various voluntary placement agencies under the chairmanship of Mr. Justice P.N. Bhagwati
(The former Chief Justice of India).
1.8
The revised guidelines as contained hereinafter have emerged from the Task Force
recommendations.